A Good but Imperfect System

​

The Canadian parliamentary system, for all its complexities, is a durable framework that has served the country for over a century. It's a system I understand and respect. However, a close look at how it operates today reveals certain flaws that don't fit the ideal. These are not fatal wounds, but they are cracks in the foundation that deserve serious attention.

​First, let's look at the concentration of power. Our Westminster system places a great deal of authority in the hands of the Prime Minister and their office. This isn't inherently bad; it allows for strong, decisive government. However, what has evolved is a level of centralized control that can stifle internal debate. Cabinet ministers, while talented and dedicated, often find their roles are more about executing a pre-determined agenda than shaping policy from the ground up. This can make the process less about genuine collaboration and more about top-down direction.

​This concentration of power extends to Parliament itself. The principle of party discipline, while necessary for a stable government, has become so strict that it can hinder an MP's ability to act on behalf of their constituents if it conflicts with the party line. The House of Commons, in practice, often functions more as a theatre for political messaging than a true forum for thoughtful debate and scrutiny. This is a flaw that weakens the legislative branch and diminishes the role of the individual MP.

​The electoral system is another area of concern. The first-past-the-post system provides strong, single-party governments, which is a key advantage. But it does so at the cost of genuine representation. A party can form a majority government with a minority of the popular vote, leaving millions of voters feeling their voice wasn't heard. This can foster a sense of disenfranchisement, particularly in regions where a party's support is strong but not concentrated enough to win seats. It’s a trade-off that, for many, is no longer acceptable.

​And finally, we face the modern challenges of disinformation and eroding public trust. Our system relies on a common set of facts and a shared respect for institutions. However, the rise of online misinformation and foreign interference attempts are undermining that shared reality. While our institutions are strong, they are not immune to these external pressures.

​Ultimately, I support our system for much of what it is. It's a stable and functional democracy. But it's time to acknowledge that certain aspects have evolved in ways that don't align with our democratic ideals. Recognizing these flaws is the first step toward a more representative and resilient political system.